So, it's possible Michael Crichton wasn't far from the mark when he wrote 2004's State of Fear. Reports of hackers exposing a ton of information from climate scientist computers reveals that the "science" behind climate change might not be so science..eee.
It's not surprising I'm a little bit giddy hearing this news, but its not because I don't believe the climate of the earth does not shift, it's because all those who worship at the alter of GLOBAL WARMING have a little esplainin' to do after shoving their green ideology down our throats for the last few years.
This also lends credence to my belief that Al Gore and the rest simply used global warming as a scheme to rip people off by investing in things like "carbon credits" and what not, as opposed to truly being interested in saving the earth. (Like when Sean Penn went down to New Orleans to video the tragedy, but didn't go to really help out).
As I've said in private many times, I'm not opposed to "going green," but I refuse to participate in something I perceive as smoke and mirrors. And, what do you know, my suspicions are starting to look less like suspicions. If you want people to go green teach them how it can save them money, don't proselytize.
Anyway, it will be interesting to see what happens to Cap & Trade in the face of this revelation. I didn't support it before because it's just a gigantic business killing taxing mechanism, but now it may lose whatever moral weight it had because its based on possibly phony science.
Just to be fair, here's another article that seems to be more apologetic to climate change.
It's not surprising I'm a little bit giddy hearing this news, but its not because I don't believe the climate of the earth does not shift, it's because all those who worship at the alter of GLOBAL WARMING have a little esplainin' to do after shoving their green ideology down our throats for the last few years.
This also lends credence to my belief that Al Gore and the rest simply used global warming as a scheme to rip people off by investing in things like "carbon credits" and what not, as opposed to truly being interested in saving the earth. (Like when Sean Penn went down to New Orleans to video the tragedy, but didn't go to really help out).
As I've said in private many times, I'm not opposed to "going green," but I refuse to participate in something I perceive as smoke and mirrors. And, what do you know, my suspicions are starting to look less like suspicions. If you want people to go green teach them how it can save them money, don't proselytize.
Anyway, it will be interesting to see what happens to Cap & Trade in the face of this revelation. I didn't support it before because it's just a gigantic business killing taxing mechanism, but now it may lose whatever moral weight it had because its based on possibly phony science.
Just to be fair, here's another article that seems to be more apologetic to climate change.
No comments:
Post a Comment